- HIK CLOUD P2P SERVER ADDRESS HOW TO
- HIK CLOUD P2P SERVER ADDRESS PDF
- HIK CLOUD P2P SERVER ADDRESS SERIAL
- HIK CLOUD P2P SERVER ADDRESS CODE
- HIK CLOUD P2P SERVER ADDRESS MAC
HIK CLOUD P2P SERVER ADDRESS PDF
Just hope that with P2P access you cannot send system variables (it's clear from the PDF that you can request them) as that would be very tragic with default creds set. Just a shame its quite so basic to have zero obfustication to allow simple creation of connections. Just like using google to search for cams.Īs I said, it was never going to be secure. You're not going to be able to target a specific unit this way without knowing it's serial, but you might well find interesting stuff. Little bit of programming, perhaps you could walk a range of serials looking for feeds with default creds and register a hit.
HIK CLOUD P2P SERVER ADDRESS SERIAL
So fishing for cameras would appear to be guessing a serial (which is constructed to a standard typically) and hoping they have not changed the default creds.
HIK CLOUD P2P SERVER ADDRESS HOW TO
Here is a guide to how to use P2P with dahua:
HIK CLOUD P2P SERVER ADDRESS CODE
As no one shared the decoding of a QR code I went looking which really did not take long. Ie: is likelyhood of finding Joe consumer has left it default > than not. Wagner - But is someone using a QR code for ease of use going to go changing default passwords, when all the marketing guff about P2P explains how easy and secure it is ? Or does it suggest also changing creds? and that's highlighted on the box / piece of paper explaining how simple it is to get working in under a minute ? If it's just sending MAC/serial, the unique cam ID to QR ID lookup is in the cloud server and that makes figuring it out somewhat harder & perhaps arguabley more secure.īut this all starts from decoding the QR code from a picture to characters which I haven't done as I don't have one. If so, it's time to look in the firmware for how the camera is creating that code as it wont be written to every single one seperately - it's not efficient for production, so would be surprising.
HIK CLOUD P2P SERVER ADDRESS MAC
Then one might go fishing with wireshark to see if the cam ever sends the QR ID code out to the cloud server, or just it's MAC address. Or change the serial if you can figure that one out. Since one can change the MAC address of many IP cameras quite easily in the bootloader (hint TTL port), perhaps one might narrow it down from 50:50 when changing the MAC stops it working. Since the only unique identifer for the cameras at QR code creation time is probably going to be the serial and the MAC, it's probably based on the values of one or the other. hint: you don't break the hash, you break the construction of it to create your own, ideally.
Having never seen one to decode myself I wondered if anyone else had given it a go and what the outputted data was.
I was wondering if it was something slightly more sensible than an obfusticated / salted MAC address, perhaps as a MD5 hash. So what's the decoding of a handful of QR codes got to say for itself ? Suppose therefore that answers the first question?
Futhermore, we have a clause in the contract that if any changes are made that requires us to come out and service the equipment and adjust any settings will be a billable call. You could argue that there is administrative overhead with static network maps with port forward solutions in where customers are jacking with the settings however, NAT/PAT solutions has worked well for us with no issues. We use only one vendor for our residential market and port forwards have worked out with no issues. I do not know, but it is becoming more common if the vendors designed the P2P solution that allowed you to specify your own server, you could essentially develop your own infrastructure for that purpose however, it might be cost prohibitive due to resources and technical skills. I wonder what is the percentage of scenarios where the NAT transversal will work properly (I guess > 85%) All of our solutions that have been implemented with NAT/PAT have been rock solid. We have used P2P only once "TRY OUT" and we have had to go back 4 times due to the application crashing or the P2P cloud not available. However, for a security company monitoring a lot of residential or small business, it is great to not having to deal with port forwarding and router configuration at each client. Until that P2P cloud is unreachable your customers are in the mercy of that 3rd party service. However, for a security company monitoring a lot of residential or small business, it's great to not have to deal with port forwarding and router configuration at each client. However, with the service in the hands of a third party with no encryption, I find it unusable for a variety of other reasons too. UDP hole punching is the most common solution on P2P Cloud Access for CCTV and it does have its advantages.
0 kommentar(er)
